Julius Caesar was vrijwel zeker in Nederland

Standbeeld van Julius Caesar
Standbeeld van Julius Caesar © AFP

Archeologen hebben bij Kessel, in de gemeente Oss, de plek ontdekt waar de Romeinse veldheer en staatsman Julius Caesar in 55 voor Christus twee Germaanse stammen vernietigde. Dat maakte de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam woensdag bekend.

In het vierde boek van de Gallische Oorlog schrijft Caesar zelf dat zijn manschappen tijdens een wapenstilstand stiekem de aanval inzetten op twee Germaanse legers. ‘Onze mannen kwamen terug naar het basiskamp, zonder ook maar één dodelijk slachtoffer en met weinig gewonden. Terwijl ze juist dachten dat het een zware strijd zou worden tegen 430.000 vijanden.’

Omdat historische verslagen lang niet altijd kloppen, bleef het onzeker of er wel daadwerkelijk een veldslag heeft plaatsgevonden. Maar nu presenteren archeologen ook fysiek bewijs, zoals skeletten, zwaarden, helmen en mantelspelden. Allemaal gevonden bij Kessel.

‘Slachtoffers niet uit Land van Maas en Waal’

Nu presenteren archeologen ook fysiek bewijs, zoals skeletten, zwaarden, helmen en mantelspelden

Caesar-kenner Jona Lendering

De Nederlandse historicus en Caesar-kenner Jona Lendering – niet betrokken bij het nieuwe onderzoek – vindt die bewijzen zeer overtuigend. ‘Archeologen zijn ontzettend op zoek naar geld en doen daarom regelmatig allerlei rare claims om aandacht en toeristen te trekken. Denk aan al dat speculatieve gedoe rond het graf van Toetanchamon. Maar daar is in dit geval geen sprake van, dit is gewoon goede wetenschap.’

‘Ik begrijp dat er goede koolstofdateringen zijn, mantelspelden van Germaanse vrouwenkleding en een biochemische analyse waaruit blijkt dat het gaat om immigranten. Zoiets kun je afleiden aan het strontium in het tandglazuur. Dan weet je dat de slachtoffers niet uit het Land van Maas en Waal kwamen. Hier is duidelijk een veldslag geweest met de Germanen.’

Laatste spoortje twijfel

Maar ik denk dat Caesar daar gewoon een vergissinkje maakte

Caesar-kenner Jona Lendering

Dat er geen tienduizenden doden zijn gevonden, vindt Lendering ook verklaarbaar. ‘Die aantallen overdreef Caesar altijd. Hij kon ook rustig duizend niet bestaande doden de boekhouding inschrijven met als doel duizend levende slaven te kunnen verkopen. Over doden hoefde hij namelijk geen belasting te betalen. Over de plekken waar hij geweest was, loog Caesar echter niet in zijn werken. Dat merk je ook aan de kennis die hij etaleert over het gebied.’

En precies daar zit het laatste spoortje twijfel dat Lendering heeft of Caesar wel echt met zijn eigen sandalen op Nederlandse bodem heeft gestaan. In zijn boek schrijft de Romeinse leider namelijk dat hij gevochten heeft op 80 mijl uit de kust, op de plek waar de Maas en de Rijn samenkomen. Lendering: ‘De veldslag is eigenlijk geleverd op de plek waar de Maas en de Waal samenkomen. Dus dat klopt niet. Maar ik denk dat Caesar daar gewoon een vergissinkje maakte. Kun je die man ook niet kwalijk nemen, hij was hier maar een paar dagen en had veel aan zijn hoofd, met al die boze Germanen om hem heen.’

TOP 10 TOILETS THROUGH TIME

Posted By: Lauren Childerhouse
Reconstruction of the toilets at Housesteads Roman Fort by Philip Corke

It’s not glamorous, but everybody needs to do it. From Romans gossiping on the loo to medieval royal bottom-wiping, to the invention of our modern flushing toilet, here are 2,000 years of toilet history!

1. Housesteads Roman Fort, Hadrian’s Wall: All together now…

The best preserved Roman loos in Britain are at Housesteads Roman Fort on Hadrian’s Wall. At its height, the fort was garrisoned by 800 men, who would use the loo block you can still see today. There weren’t any cubicles, so men sat side by side, free to gossip on the events of the day. They didn’t have loo roll either, so many used a sponge on a stick, washed and shared by many people – lovely!

Visit Housesteads Roman Fort

Roman toilets at Housesteads Roman Fort on Hadrian's Wall

 

2. Old Sarum, Wiltshire: Luxury facilities, until you have to clean them…

These deep cesspits sat beneath the Norman castle at Old Sarum, probably underneath rooms reached from the main range, like private bathrooms. In the medieval period luxury castles were built with indoor toilets known as ‘garderobes’, and the waste dropped into a pit below. It was the job of the ‘Gongfarmer’ to remove it – one of the smelliest jobs in history? At Old Sarum the Gongfarmer was dangled from a rope tied around his waist, while he emptied the two 5m pits.

Visit Old Sarum

The garderobe pits at Old Sarum

 

3. Dover Castle, Kent: The royal wee

Henry II made sure that Dover Castle was well provided with garderobes. He had his own en-suite facilities off the principal bed-chamber. As with many castles of the era, chutes beneath the garderobes were built so that the waste fell into a pit which could be emptied from outside the building.

Medieval nobility would likely have a ‘groom of the stool’ – an important servant within the household responsible for making the experience comfortable for his employer, and bottom wiping!

Visit Dover Castle

Henry II's bedchamber at Dover Castle

 

4. Goodrich Castle, Herefordshire: The toilet tower

At Goodrich Castle there’s a whole tower dedicated to doing your business. The garderobe tower was built in the later Middle Ages to replace a small single latrine, and the survival of such as large example is extremely rare in England in Wales. The loos could be accessed from the courtyard from one of three doors, leading to the ‘cubicles’. There might have been more than one seat in each chamber.

Visit Goodrich Castle

Garderobe Tower at Goodrich Castle - the middle tower

 

5. Orford Castle, Suffolk: A Norman urinal

Garderobes are quite common in medieval castles, but urinals are a little more unusual. Henry II’s Orford Castlewas built as a show of royal power, and to guard the busy port of Orford. The constable – a senior royal official in charge of the castle – had his own private room, which has a urinal built into the thick castle wall.

Visit Orford Castle

Norman urinal at Orford Castle

 

6. Muchelney Abbey, Somerset: Thatched loo for monks

Many medieval abbey ruins across the country include the remains of the latrines, or ‘reredorter’ (meaning literally ‘at the back of the dormitory’), including Muchelney AbbeyCastle Acre Priory and Battle Abbey. At Muchelney the building survives with a thatched roof, making it the only one of its kind in Britain. The monks would enter the loo block via their dormitory and take their place in a cubicle – you can still see the fixings for the bench and partitions between each seat.

Visit Muchelney Abbey

The thatched monks' latrines at Muchelney Abbey

 

7. Jewel Tower, London: The Privy Palace

A precious survival from the medieval Palace of Westminster, Jewel Tower was part of the ‘Privy Palace’, the residence of the medieval kings and their families from 11th to 16th century. It was well supplied with garderobes, with one on each of the three floors. As the tower housed the royal treasure, while sitting on the loo you might have enjoyed the richest view in the kingdom!

Visit Jewel Tower

Door at Jewel Tower

 

8. Old Wardour Castle, Wiltshire: ‘A new discourse of a stale subject’

The forerunner to our modern flushing toilet was invented at Old Wardour Castle. The inventor Sir John Harington met with five others at the castle to discuss his idea for the first time in 1592. Sir John might have been influenced by the plumbing situation at Old Wardour – in the 14th century the castle was built with luxurious ‘en-suites’ for many of the important chambers, but by the end of the century it was more likely to just cause a big stink as both shafts and drains frequently blocked up.

Visit Old Wardour Castle

Old Wardour Castle

 

9. Audley End House, Essex: Feeling flush

Along with many other technological advancements, Audley End was one of the first country houses in England to have flushing toilets. The first of Joseph Bramah’s new hinged-valve water closets was purchased in 1775, and a further 4 were bought in 1785 at a cost equivalent to the wages of two servants for a whole year! Although none of the Bramah toilets survive, there are two other early loos from the 1870s, one next to the chapel and another in the Coal Gallery.

Visit Audley End

Toilet at Audley End (structure on right)

 

10. Brodsworth Hall, South Yorkshire: Thunderboxes

Inside the elegant Victorian country house of Brodsworth Hall almost everything has been left exactly as it was when it was still a family home. So as well as the grand furniture, there’s also everything from the commodes of the 1840s to a modern pink bathroom from the 1960s/70s. A highlight has to be the flush thunderboxes – essentially mahogany boxes with a hole, and a brass handle for flushing – part of the original sanitary arrangements in the 1860s.

Visit Brodsworth Hall

Thunderbox at Brodsworth Hall

 

Uncover More Stories

If you fancy flushing out more toilet tales at historic sites around the country, choose from hundreds of castles, abbeys and ruins here. Don’t forget that English Heritage membership offers free access to over 400 historic sites, free or reduced price entry to hundreds of events and loads of other benefits.

The quest for the Holy Grail

The quest for the Holy Grail has obsessed everyone from medieval poets and crusading knights to modern churchmen, historians, archaeologists, filmmakers, novelists and Nazi leaders – yet we don’t know what it looks like, or even whether it exists at all…

This article was first published in the October 2015 issue of History Revealed

The Last Supper and first Eucharist, during which Jesus serves wine in the Holy Chalice. © Corbis

In the most popular version of the story, the Holy Grail is a chalice used by Jesus during the Last Supper, which was later employed as a vial for his blood. It was seemingly smuggled across the Holy Land and Europe to Britain. Despite a series of mysterious Grail guardians, including the Fisher King and the Knights Templar, at some point the chalice disappeared.

The sacred silverware became spliced with other legends, invested with mythical powers, and hijacked by conspiracy theorists and demagogues. Pat Kinsella separates the few facts from the profuse fictions that continue to evolve around this elusive relic…

 

Birth of a legend: Where did the Holy Grail come from? And what might it be?

Holy relics purporting to originate from the earthly life of Jesus are common currency across the Catholic world – with various churches claiming to hold everything from the Holy Prepuce (Jesus’s foreskin) through to nails used during his crucifixion. The most iconic and sought-after souvenir of all, however, is the ever-elusive Holy Grail.

The enduring obsession with the Holy Grail is fuelled by the fact that its form, location and very existence remain a complete enigma. It’s popularly believed to be a goblet used during the Last Supper and then employed by Joseph of Arimathea to catch Christ’s blood when his side was pierced with a spear during his crucifixion. However, some depictions have it as a bowl or a serving plate, or even as the womb of Mary Magdalene – in a scenario where she bears Jesus’s offspring.

The Holy Chalice from the Last Supper is referenced in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke (which historians believe were written c80-100 AD), but it was 1,000 years later that the tale of the Grail became popular, when the medieval romantics began to pen poems about it, entwining the yarn with Arthurian sagas.

The first-known reference to the Grail was made by French poet Chrétien de Troyes in Perceval, le Conte du Graal (which translates as ‘Percival, the Story of the Grail’), an unfinished poem written sometime between 1181 and 1190. Chrétien credits a source book, but the original work remains a mystery.

His fantastical yarn sees Percival – one of King Arthur’s knights  – visit the realm of the Fisher King (the last in a line of men entrusted with the keeping of the Grail). There, he beholds several revered items, including a graal (‘grail’) – an elaborate bowl from which the King eats a communion wafer. Although the Grail is more prop than main player in this poem, it inspired other writers to develop the concept.

In Joseph d’Arimathie, written between 1191 and 1202, fellow Frenchman Robert de Boron fused the Holy Chalice used at the Last Supper, and the Holy Grail, a vessel containing Jesus’s blood. Joseph of Arimathea is cast as the protector of the Grail, the first of a long line of guardians that will include Percival.

In the early 13th century, German poet Wolfram von Eschenbach developed the story in Parzival, (‘Percival’), an epic poem in which the hero embarks on a quest to recover the Grail. The Welsh romance Peredur continued the theme, but the story really took form in the Vulgate Cycle, a series of Arthurian legends written anonymously in the 13th century.

Two centuries later, Sir Thomas Malory translated these legends into English in Le Morte D’Arthur and the sagas – especially the quest for the Grail – have enjoyed waves of popularity ever since, being retold by a colourful collection of raconteurs from Wagner and Tennyson through to Monty Python, Spielberg and Dan Brown. But is there any fact amongst all the fantasy?

 

The Grail trail: For centuries, explorers have chased the Grail’s shadow all over the planet

Although most popular versions of the story ultimately point towards the chalice being transported to England, committed Grail hunters have chased the holy relic all over the world. Every perceived clue from ancient texts has been painstakingly pursued, while long-shot leads and far-fetched theories have led their followers to some fairly unlikely corners.

Over 200 churches and locations around the globe have laid claim to having current or historic possession of either or both the Holy Chalice and the Holy Grail – with some stretching the realm of credibility much further than others. Having a semi-plausible relic or a good miracle story can generate a boom in tourism for otherwise out-of-the-way destinations. As the public’s obsession with the Grail tale shows little sign of abating, it’s become big business, right around the world…

Basilica of San Isidoro in León, Spain

Home to the Chalice of Doña Urraca, a jewel-encrusted onyx goblet identified as the Holy Grail by author-researchers Margarita Torres and José Ortega del Rio in their 2014 book, The Kings of the Grail. The chalice has been in the Basilica since the 11th century, after apparently being transported to Cairo by Muslim travellers. It was later given to an emir on the Spanish coast who’d helped famine victims in Egypt, and passed to King Ferdinand I of Leon as a peace offering by an Andalusian ruler. Carbon dating suggests the chalice was made between 200 BC and AD 100.

 

Cattedrale di San Lorenzo, Italy

House of the Genoa Chalice, once thought to be made from pure emerald and a hot contender for the Holy Grail, until it was transported to Paris after Napoleon conquered Italy and came back broken – revealing the ‘emerald’ was, in fact, green glass. This news would have come as a disappointment to the Genoese soldiers, who named it as their chief target when they defeated the Moors and sacked Almería in a ferocious conflict in 1147.

The Cathedral of Genoa, where a glassy Grail contender resides. © Alamy

 

Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, US

Current home of the Antioch Chalice, a silver-and-gold double-cup design ornament, touted as the Holy Chalice when it was recovered in Antioch, Turkey, just before World War I. The museum has always described this claim as ‘ambitious’ and the relic was recently outed as a standing lamp, not a chalice, believed to have been made in the sixth century AD.

 

Catedrale de Valencia, Spain

The Valencia Chalice is housed in its very own consecrated chapel. The agate cup was reportedly taken by Saint Peter to Rome in the first century AD, and then to Huesca in Spain by Saint Lawrence in the third century. Some Spanish archaeologists say the cup was produced in a Palestinian or Egyptian workshop between the fourth century BC and the first century AD.

 

The Jerusalem Chalice, Israel

In the seventh century AD, a Gaulish monk named Arculf recorded seeing a vessel he believed to be the Holy Chalice contained within a reliquary in a chapel near Jerusalem, between the basilica of Golgotha and the Martyrium. This is the earliest known first-hand report of the Grail after the crucifixion, and the only known mention of the Grail being seen in the Holy Land. The fate of the chalice he described is unknown. It has also been claimed that the Grail is hidden with other holy relics in the vast underground sewer complex of Jerusalem, beneath the legendary Solomon’s Temple.

Beneath Temple Mount in Jerusalem some believe there could be a whole host of holy relics. © iStock

 

Over to Albion: The Grail myths are as much entwined with British folklore as international history…

After the crucifixion of Jesus, for reasons that remain unclear (and which may well owe more to poetic license and political and economic expediency than historical fact), the story of the Holy Grail is quickly transplanted from the Holy Land to the green and pleasant land of England.

According to legends that have been doing the rounds for at least the last 800 years, the keeper of the Grail, Joseph of Arimathea, arrived in England in the first century AD. He crossed the Somerset Levels (then flooded) by boat to arrive at the foot of Glastonbury Tor on an island known in Arthurian mythology as Avalon.

At the foot of Wearyall Hill, just beneath the Tor, the tired missionary thrust his staff into the ground, and rested. In the morning, so the story goes, his staff had taken root and grown into an oriental thorn bush now known as the Glastonbury Thorn.

Joseph then went on to found Glastonbury Abbey, and set about converting the locals to Christianity – with a staggering success rate. By 600 AD, England had a Christian king: Ethelbert. Meanwhile the Grail – which, according to some stories, was buried at the entrance to the underworld in Glastonbury – became firmly interwoven into myths about King Arthur and the knights of the Round Table.

Contemporary records mention none of this, though, and the story only became popular after the publication of Robert de Boron’s fanciful poem Joseph d’Arimathie at the end of the 12th century. The area may have been a significant site for pre-Christian communities, but Glastonbury Abbey was almost certainly established by Britons in the early seventh century.

However, stories connecting the dots between the site, Arthurian legend, the presence of the Holy Grail and miracles performed by ‘blood relatives’ of Jesus were all excellent marketing for the pilgrimage trade at Glastonbury. The local monks wholeheartedly endorsed the fables, right up until the Abbey was dissolved in 1539, during the English Reformation.

An early example of this can be seen when, in 1184, a fire destroyed most of the monastic buildings at Glastonbury. A few years later, around the time Joseph d’Arimathie was published, King Arthur and Queen Guinevere’s tomb was miraculously discovered in the cemetery. There was a spike in pilgrimage traffic and the funds needed to rebuild the Abbey.

According to myth, King Arthur’s wizard Merlin still roams Glastonbury Tor. © Alamy

 

A good story: From medieval poems to modern action movies, the Grail has provided centuries of entertainment

For two millennia, the legend of the Holy Grail has been reported and contorted by imaginative poets, painters, writers, comedians and filmmakers – to such an extent that the small number of known facts have become increasingly hard to sift from an overwhelming mountain of speculative or purely artistic ideas.

Amateur historians and professional authors have gone off on wild tangents, generating countless pseudo-historical books masquerading as seriously researched non-fiction. Indeed, a vast amount of flimsy and fantastical evidence has been reported as fact to support questionable theories. As a result, the Grail story has assumed a life of its own – one that constantly plays out on the pages of books and websites, and on TV and cinema screens – and each generation consumes a new version of it.

 

Back in the limelight: Victorian revivalism

During the deeply religious fervour of the Victorian era, medievalism was the all the rage and yarns from the Middle Ages, such as Malory’s Le Morte D’Arthur, were constantly being reprinted and consumed by a public hungry for tales of chivalry and salvation.

The quest for the Holy Grail was a recurring theme across the arts throughout the age, but everything was based on the medieval myth, rather than known facts and historical events.

Painters began to depict scenes from Arthurian legends, especially members of the ever-earnest Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. When commissioned to decorate Oxford University’s new union building, founder of the Brotherhood Dante Gabriel Rossetti used the Holy Grail as his central theme – thus seeding an awareness and interest in the subject in the fertile minds of future generations of scholars. It was a theme that Rossetti would return to numerous times in his watercolour paintings.

Over several decades, the pre-eminent poet of the era, Alfred Lord Tennyson (Poet Laureate for 40 years during Victoria’s reign), published the epic Idylls of the King, a cycle of twelve narrative poems that retell the legend of King Arthur and his knights – including, of course, the quest for the Grail. These immensely popular poems were dedicated to the late Prince Albert.

William Morris, one of the most significant cultural figures of the era whose talents spanned everything from poetry to interior design, was also acutely interested in the sagas. He wrote verses about the Holy Chalice, and collaborated with Pre-Raphaelite artist Edward Burne-Jones to produce vast tapestries depicting the quest for the Grail, which were hung on the walls of the wealthiest businessmen of the industrial age.

This vast Victorian tapestry, named ‘The Achievement of the Grail’ measures 2.4 metres high by nearly 7 metres long. It is currently on display in the Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery. © BAL

 

20th-century style: The quest on screen

The Grail has been quested after on big and little screens since technology made it possible, but most people will recall the story from at least one of three successful cinematic renditions…

Excalibur (1981), was directed by John Boorman and starred Nigel Terry, Helen Mirren, Patrick Stewart and Liam Neeson, among many others. An action-packed adventure fantasy, it follows the story of King Arthur, from the moment he pulls the sword from the stone, to the quest for the Grail (via Guinevere and Lancelot’s affair). The film, in contrast to most of the medieval literature, has Percival retrieve the Grail for an ailing Arthur, who sips from it and is restored to health.

 

Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975), was the Python posse’s first foray into full-length feature films and it is a gloriously ridiculous romp through the Arthurian sagas, with Graham Chapman in the lead role. As the hapless knights search for the Holy Grail they face various challenges and dangers, not least a killer rabbit.

A shot from Monty Python and the Holy Grail. © Kobal

 

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989), the third of Steven Spielberg’s successful series of movies starring Harrison Ford as a swashbuckling archaeologist, sees Indy in action trying to rescue his father (Sean Connery). He then needs to find the Holy Grail before the Nazis get hold of it and use it to achieve world domination. Sound stupid? You might be surprised how close some of the plot elements are to the truth…

Ancient Luxury and the Roman Silver Treasure from Berthouville

Pitcher with Scenes from the Trojan War / Mercury

L: Pitcher with Scenes from the Trojan War, Roman, 1st century AD. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris; R: Mercury, Roman, AD 175–225. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris. Photos courtesy the J. Paul Getty Trust

Ancient Luxury and the Roman Silver Treasure from Berthouville

September 19, 2015 – January 10, 2016
ROSEKRANS COURT, SPECIAL EXHIBITION GALLERIES 20D-F

In 1830, a French farmer plowing his field near the village of Berthouville, in rural Normandy, accidentally discovered a hoard of spectacular silver-gilt objects that were deliberately buried during antiquity. The items, all dated to the first or second century AD, were dedicated to the Roman god Mercury and collectively became known as the Berthouville Treasure. After four years of meticulous conservation at the Getty Villa this splendid collection of Roman silver comes to San Francisco in Ancient Luxury and the Roman Silver Treasure from Berthouville. The exhibition features more than 160 pieces, including selections from this find as well as precious gems, jewelry, and other Roman luxury objects from the royal collections of the Cabinet des médailles at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris.

The site where the Berthouville Treasure’s approximately 90 silver-gilt statuettes and vessels were found was surveyed and excavated in 1861 and 1896, revealing the foundations of a Gallo-Roman fanum, or sanctuary: a square, colonnaded precinct with two temples. There is no evidence of a permanent settlement nearby, indicating that the place may have been intended for pilgrimage, and perhaps was visited during annual festivals.

The most impressive items bear Latin inscriptions stating that they were dedicated to Mercury by a Roman citizen named Quintus Domitius Tutus. Several of the vessels, which are profusely ornamented in high relief and gilded, are recognized today as among the finest surviving ancient Roman silver objects. Shortly after their discovery, the pieces were acquired by the Bibliothèque nationale de France, where they were cleaned and restored using 19th-century methods. The recent conservation has allowed for more meticulous and modern treatments, which, combined with the research done by Getty scholars, have produced valuable new insights regarding these objects.

The Cabinet des médailles is one of the premier repositories of ancient luxury arts. The objects from its holdings on display in Ancient Luxury and the Roman Silver Treasure from Berthouville include four newly restored Late Antique missoria (silver platters), cameos, intaglios, gold coins and jewelry, and marble and bronze sculptures. These artifacts demonstrate the high skill of Roman craftsmen, and their study at the Getty has revealed valuable information about social relations from the first to the sixth centuries AD, at the height of the Roman Empire.

Exhibition Preview

Beaker with imagery related to Isthmia and Corinth, Roman, 1st century AD. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Cup with masks, Roman, 1st century AD. Silver. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Pitcher with scenes from the Trojan War, Roman, 1st century AD. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Coin of Hadrian, minted in Rome, AD 134–138. Gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Plate with the embassy to Achilles, known as the Shield of Scipio, Roman, 375–400 AD. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Offering bowl with Bacchus, Hercules, and coins, Roman, ca. AD 210. Gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Bowl with a medallion of Omphale, Roman, 1st century AD. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Cameo of emperor Trajan, Roman, ca. AD 100. Sardonyx set in 17th-century mount of gold, enamel, and ruby. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Mercury, Roman, AD 175–225. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris
Offering bowl with a medallion of Mercury in a rural shrine, Roman, AD 175–225. Silver and gold. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris

This exhibition is organized by the J. Paul Getty Museum in collaboration with the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des Monnaies, médailles et antiques, Paris.

 

Generous support is provided by the Ancient Art Council.

First early Roman era fort found on Anglesey

The small fort on land near Cemlyn Bay and close to the Wylfa power station could point to more discoveries on the island say Gwynedd Archaelogical Trust

Gwynedd Archeological Trust An new Roman era 'fortlet' has been found on Anglesey

An new Roman era ‘fortlet’ has been found on Anglesey 

Archaeologists say they have made a ground-breaking discovery on Anglesey.

Experts have found what appears to be a small Roman fort on land near Cemlyn Bay and close to the Wylfa power station,.

The ‘fortlet’ is thought to date back to the first century AD and is surrounded by a circular ditch which has not been seen anywhere else in Wales.

And the Gwynedd Archaelogical Trust says the discovery is particularly exciting because it is the first early Roman military site to be found on the island.

The conquest of Anglesey was famously described two thousand years ago in lurid detail by the Roman senator and historian Tacitus.

Gwynedd Archeological TrustA geographical survey has revealed a birds eye picture of the fortlet on Anglesey
A geographical survey has revealed a birds eye picture of the fortlet on Anglesey

But until now, historians have searched in vain for any sign of forts and roads on the island.

There are now hopes that this will lead to further discoveries on Anglesey.

Roman anchors found in Menai Strait to be auctioned

Traditionally, Roma forts and fortlets are usually linked by roads a day’s march apart – pointing to the the possibility that there could be more in central Anglesey around 15 to 20 miles away.

The archaeologists were first alerted to the site by local aerial photographer and historian Mary Aris who had spotted a faint circular mark in crops on a low hill overlooking the Anglesey coastline.

As a result, the Gwynedd Archaeological Trust received grant funding from CADW to carry out a geophysical survey of the site.

Anglesey dig unearths largest neolithic site in Wales

David Hopewell, Senior Archaeologist for the Gwynedd Archaeolgical Trust, who carried out the survey, said: “Fortlets are smaller versions of Roman forts and are often found at significant points on Roman roads or at lookout points.

David Hopwell of GAT with analytical equipment
David Hopwell of GAT with analytical equipment

“The results of the geophysical survey were unusually clear as they showed the unmistakable outline of a Roman fortlet and faint traces of rectangular buildings that are most probably barracks.”

The results will now be included in the fourth of Gwynedd Archaeological Trust’s winter lectures.

Anglesey: Mysterious artefact discovered at Neolithic tomb

This will be delivered by Mr Hopewell on Wednesday December 2 at the Telford Centre, Menai Bridge and is entitled “Post-medieval roads and their archaeology, with an update on Roman discoveries on Anglesey.”

Timeline: The rise and fall of the Roman games

Dr Miles Russell reveals the story of the most gruesome spectator sports from the Roman period, from the first-ever races to the final battles…

This article was first published in the July 2014 issue of History Revealed

A heroic charioteer is immortalised in bronze. © BAL

753 BC

The traditional date given for the first chariot race between the Roman people and their neighbours, the Sabines, organised by Rome’s legendary founder, Romulus.

 

264 BC

The first recorded gladiatorial fight to the death is staged between slaves at the funeral of aristocrat Brutus Pera, in the Forum Boarium, Rome.

Roman gladiators. © TopFoto

 

174 BC

The Roman Consul, Gaius Flaminius, hosts a games within a purpose-built timber arena constructed in the Forum Romanum. It stars 74 gladiators, fighting over a three-day period.

 

174 BC

The Circus Maximus chariot race-track is rebuilt in stone. It can now seat some 150,000 spectators, but it will be developed further, making room for 100,000 more.

 

73 BC

The gladiator Spartacus leads a slave revolt from the training school at Capua.

© Mary Evans

 

65 BC

Opponents of Julius Caesar, worried that he is staking a claim for supreme power, attempt to curb the number of gladiators owned by any one individual. Despite this, Caesar’s games go ahead, with over 640 gladiators fighting to the death.

 

29 BC

The first purpose-built stone amphitheatre is constructed by General Titus Statilius Taurus in Rome. Taurus also paid for the inaugural games.

 

AD 37

The emperor Caligula entertains the crowds by having criminals thrown to carnivorous wild animals in the arena.

Emperor Caligula. © SuperStock

 

AD 59

Large numbers of spectators are killed in rioting at the Pompeian games. Outraged, the Senate bans Pompeii from hosting any games for a decade.

 

AD 67

Emperor Nero takes part in a ten-horse chariot race in Greece and, although he fails to finish, falling from the car during the event, he later claims to have won.

 

AD 70

Construction of the Flavian amphitheatre – now known as the Colosseum – is begun by Emperor Vespasian.

The Colosseum in Rome. © Thinkstock

 

AD 80

The inaugural games of the Colosseum are held by Emperor Titus. Over 100 days of celebratory combat ensue, during which time thousands of wild animals – and quite a few slave warriors – are killed.

 

AD 112

Emperor Trajan hosts three months of games with the participation of over 10,000 gladiators.

 

c146 AD

The most successful charioteer, Gaius Appuleius Diocles, winner of over 1,000 races, retires at the age of 42, being hailed the ‘champion of charioteers’.

 

AD 180-192

Throughout his reign, Emperor Commodus takes part in gladiatorial combat, allegedly ensuring victory by making sure his opponents have extra-heavy weapons made of lead.

 

AD 380

After Christianity becomes the state faith, the Church attempts to limit the popularity of the games, declaring that those who participate in them are ineligible for baptism.

Christian icons, such as halos, start to appear on Roman artworks. © Superstock

 

AD 681

After centuries of waning popularity, and with the decline of the Roman Empire, gladiatorial combat is officially banned as a sport.

Dr Miles Russell is a senior lecturer in prehistoric and Roman archaeology at Bournemouth University.

What did people eat in Ancient Rome?

As part of our ‘History Extra explains’ series, leading historians answer the burning questions you were too afraid to ask…

Dinner party, Pompeii, Italy © Heritage Image Partnership Ltd / Alamy

What did they eat in Ancient Rome?

The Romans ate pretty much everything they could lay their hands on. Meat, especially pork and fish, however, were expensive commodities, and so the bulk of the population survived on cereals (wheat, emmer and barley) mixed with chickpeas, lentils, turnips, lettuce, leek, cabbage and fenugreek.

Olives, grapes, apples, plums and figs provided welcome relief from the traditional forms of thick, cereal-based porridge (tomatoes and potatoes were a much later introduction to the Mediterranean), while milk, cheese, eggs and bread were also daily staples.

The Romans liked to vary their cooking with sweet (honey) and sour (fermented fish) sauces, which often helpfully disguised the taste of rotten meat.

Dining as entertainment was practised within elite society – lavish dinner parties were the ideal way to show off wealth and status. Recipes compiled in the 4th century supply us with details of tasty treats such as pickled sow’s udders and stuffed dormice.

Dr Miles Russell is a senior lecturer in prehistoric and Roman archaeology, with more than 25 years experience of archaeological fieldwork and publication.

For more burning historical Q&As on the Tudors, ancient Rome, the First World War and ancient Egypt, click here.

THE MYSTERIOUS ABSENCE OF STABLES AT ROMAN CAVALRY FORTS

How recent archaeological excavations on Hadrian’s Wall have revealed why it has always been so difficult to discover where Roman soldiers kept their horses.

A relief depicting a Roman cavalry soldier

A relief depicting a Roman cavalry soldier
© The Art Archive/Alamy

TYNESIDE FINDS

Many barracks have been found in Roman cavalry forts, such as Chesters on Hadrian’s Wall, but few stables – and visitors often ask where the horses were kept. Until recently it was believed that there must have been separate stables, but these have only rarely been found. Now, thanks to recent excavations, we can understand why.

In 1998–2000 the first complete modern excavations of cavalry barracks on Hadrian’s Wall took place at Wallsend and South Shields. At both sites, each of the contubernia – the pairs of rooms into which barrack blocks were divided – contained a centrally placed, elongated pit in its front room. Corresponding with each front-room pit was a hearth in the rear room.

This arrangement was immediately recognised as exactly resembling that found in some Roman fort buildings on the Continent, where preserved hay and fodder showed that horses had been stabled in the front room. The pits, covered with boards or stone slabs, collected horse urine and kept the floor dry.

The remains of the barracks at Chesters Roman Fort

The remains of the barracks at Chesters Roman Fort

COMMUNAL LIVING

Such buildings had until then only ever been revealed fragmentarily and had been interpreted as stables. But the buildings at Wallsend and South Shields were – as their plans confirmed when revealed in their entirety – clearly barracks of conventional type, complete with end-buildings for officers.

They demonstrate conclusively that horses were accommodated in the same buildings as their riders, with the animals in the front rooms and their riders in the rooms behind. This, of course, meant that the horses would have been available for instant deployment – a military advantage that would be completely lost if the cavalry mounts were stabled or corralled elsewhere.

Reconstruction of the ‘stable-barracks’ at Chesters Roman Fort

Reconstruction of the ‘stable-barracks’ at Chesters Roman Fort
© English Heritage (drawing by John Ronayne)

PERFECT FIT

The discoveries at Wallsend and South Shields made sense in another way too. Each front room – a square of at least 3.6 metres across, or 12 Roman feet – would have been able to accommodate three horses, close to their riders. In each rear room, therefore, slept three troopers.

A textbook cavalry barrack with ten contubernia would thus have neatly housed the 30 or so men and horses that are known to have made up the cavalry equivalent of a century – a ‘troop’ or turma.

MYTH BUSTER

A German archaeologist, Sebastian Sommer, had already predicted in 1995 that one day such combined stables and barracks would be shown to be the standard form of accommodation for Roman cavalry. His view was vindicated by the Wallsend and South Shields excavations. At a stroke, they resolved two mysteries: where the horses were kept, and why it had been so hard to identify separate stabling in Roman forts.

The elusive separate stables were, in fact, a myth, and since 2000 ‘stable-barrack’ features have been recognised by geophysical survey or excavation at many other forts in the Roman Empire.

NATURAL BOND

Many people find it difficult to believe that Roman cavalrymen and their horses would have lived in such close proximity.

But this archaeological discovery shows that we should overcome our modern preconceptions, and remember that these soldiers were the descendants of the barbarian horsemen from whom the Roman auxiliary cavalry had originally been raised.

There was a natural bond between these mounted warriors and their steeds. The trooper and his mount rode together and lived together in a tight-knit community, realising that, as the ancient writer Xenophon advised, ‘It is plain that in danger the master entrusts his life to his horse.’

 

By Nick Hodgson

Exotic origins of Roman Londoners revealed by DNA analysis of bones

Museum of London study into skeletal remains of four of the earliest Londoners discovers how they lived – and died

This skull of a Roman Londoner who met a violent end was found in a pit with 38 others.
 This skull of a Roman Londoner who met a violent end was found in a pit with 38 others. Photograph: BBC News/PA

The exotic origins and disastrous teeth of a group of Roman Londoners have been uncovered in a landmark analysis of DNA and other skeletal evidence which revealed their ancestry, hair and eye colouring and the diseases that afflicted them.

Although the four Londoners ranged from a teenage girl buried with a wealth of grave goods to a middle-aged man who may have died in gladiatorial combat or as an executed criminal in the amphitheatre, all suffered from gum disease. None of them were born in London and at least two may have come from north Africa.

The study by experts across many disciplines, for the Museum of London, is the most detailed on a group of remains from anywhere in the former Roman empire.

The most gruesome was the skull of a man found among 38 others in pits along the long-vanished Walbrook river. The evidence suggested that his head was thrown into shallow stagnant water and had been left exposed in the open air, as his jaw had been gnawed by a dog.

He died a violent death after a violent life: he had old, healed injuries including a broken cheekbone, and had suffered many blunt force blows to the face and head around the time of his death. The pits were close to the site of the amphitheatre where he may have died, either as a fighter or executed by the Roman army. Evidence from other sites, including the Crossrail site beside Liverpool Street station, suggests that trophy heads were deliberately exposed as a grotesque warning to enemies.

The man had black hair and brown eyes and was probably not born in Britain. His mother’s family came from eastern Europe or the near east.

The girl, only 14 when she died sometime between AD300 and AD400, was found in a Roman cemetery at Lant Street in Southwark. She was 1.6m tall and blue eyed, but, despite a diet including meat, fish, vegetables and cereals, she had poor teeth and suffered from rickets, a childhood disease caused by vitamin D deficiency.

There was not enough DNA evidence to reveal her hair colour, but she probably grew up in north Africa, and her mother’s ancestry was from eastern Europe or north-east Africa. Despite her youth and fragile health, she was clearly a valued member of her community, and the archaeologists speculate that she could have come to London as a soldier’s daughter or a beloved slave.

She was buried on a bed of chalk, with two glass vessels by her head, and a wooden casket with bronze fittings and bone inlays – carved with an image of Vesta, the goddess of hearth and home – at her feet. She also had a rare folding knife with an ivory handle carved as a leopard or panther, an expensive import possibly made in Carthage, and a bronze key.

The other woman, found at Harper Road, was aged between 26 and 35, and buried in the earliest years of Roman London, possibly at a field boundary, between AD50 and AD70. She would have been a first generation Londoner, alive at the time of the Roman invasion, and may have lived long enough to see the destruction of much of the city in the Boudiccan rebellion of AD70.

She was a white with northern European ancestry, though she was probably born in Britain. She had dark brown hair and brown eyes, and although she appeared physically female, her chromosomes were male (scientists now regard biological sex as a spectrum rather than a simple male/female binary).

She was buried in a wooden coffin with grave goods that made hers a rare and high status burial at a time when cremation was more common. She had a flagon by her head, fine Samian ware dishes by her feet, a torc necklace and a bronze mirror probably imported from Italy. Mirrors were extremely expensive and mirror burials were rare. Some have suggested they were used for divination.

The bones of the fourth individual, a man aged over 45, were found at Mansell Street, which was the eastern boundary of Roman London when he was buried between AD180 and AD400. He had dark brown hair and brown eyes, a skull shape associated with some African populations and DNA suggesting ancestry in Europe or north Africa.

He suffered from two painful and rare conditions, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, a form of osteoarthritis that can cause the vertebrae to fuseand is associated with a rich diet and diabetes, and Paget’s disease, which causes weak and brittle bones. He too had poor teeth and gum disease. No grave goods were found with him, but the grave had been disturbed by Victorian builders.

The remains of the four individuals, and the analysis, will be on display in a free exhibition, Written in Bone, at the Museum of London from 27 November.

A tablet bearing a birthday party invite includes the earliest Latin script penned by a woman

roman-writing-tablet-northumberland

(© The Trustees of the British Museum/Art Resource, NY)

 

What is it?

A writing tablet

Date

Ca. A.D. 100

Material

Locally sourced wood and carbon ink

Found

Vindolanda Fort, Northumberland, northern England

Dimensions

About the size of a postcard

On the Roman Empire’s cold and rainy northern frontier, in what is now Britian, sat the fort of Vindolanda. Beginning in 1973, excavators there began to find waterlogged tablets and fragments of tablets covered with Roman cursive writing. Once conserved and deciphered, the tablets provided rare details of the daily life and workings of the fort—lists of necessary supplies, including bacon, oysters, and honey; a letter to a soldier from home saying that more socks, sandals, and underwear have been sent; and descriptions of the native Britons the Romans came into contact with. Among the tablets—the oldest handwritten documents in Britain—survives an invitation (translated below) from the fort commander’s wife to her sister for a birthday bash:

 

Claudia Severa to her Lepidina, greetings. On 11 September, sister, for the day of the celebration of my birthday, I give you a warm invitation to make sure that you come to us, to make the day more enjoyable for me by your arrival, if you are present. Give my greetings to your Cerialis. My Aelius and my little son send him their greetings. I shall expect you, sister. Farewell, sister, my dearest soul, as I hope to prosper and hail. To Sulpicia Lepidina, wife of Cerialis, from Severa. 

 

The commander Aelius’ wife, Claudia, would certainly have had someone to compose her correspondence, as evidenced by the professional hand used for most of the missive. But there is also a personal salutation written by Claudia herself (in bold above), which is the earliest known example of writing in Latin by a woman.